> Do you really believe that anyone is going to maintain the CML1 tools > for as long as a nanosecond after they get dropped out of the kernel tree? Do you really believe anyone would be dumb enough to delete them out of spite or to further your political machinations if they could both handle the same configuration language. CML1 has had no official maintainer for about 4 years. People contribute bits and it works. So as it stands there would be no reason to remove it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosop... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design phil... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 de... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 de... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 de... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 de... Ben Ford
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Lang
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Alan Cox
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Christer Weinigel
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosop... Michael Meissner
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design phil... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design phil... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design... Christoph Hellwig