On Friday 19 July 2013, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5507f2b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +MOXA ART Watchdog timer
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Should be "moxa,moxart-watchdog"
> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
> +- clocks : Should contain phandle for the MOXA ART core clock "coreclk"
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + watchdog: watchdog@98500000 {
> + compatible = "moxa,moxart-watchdog";
> + reg = <0x98500000 0x10>;
> + clocks = <&coreclk>;
> + };
I think the property descriptions need to be clarified here:
* I think "should" makes no sense for the "compatible" property since it is
required here, you probably mean "must", see
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
* for the clock, make sure that the description is from the point of view of
the device you are describing, not from the perspective of the clock
controller.
The device should not make any assumptions about who provides a clock, only
what it is used for, and it sounds like "coreclk" is an SoC-wide identifier,
not the name of the clock input of the watchdog device. This is not as
important
as you don't define a "clock-names" property here, butsomething to keep in
mind anyway.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
