Return -1 (like Intels apply_microcode) when the loading fails, also
do not set the active microcode level on failure.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.l...@googlemail.com>
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c 2013-07-23 19:42:16.089517717 +0200
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c 2013-07-23 19:43:30.359517091 +0200
@@ -220,12 +220,13 @@ int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
return 0;
}
- if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd))
+ if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) {
pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n",
cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
- else
- pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu,
- mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu,
+ mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
