On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:51:14PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:51:14 -0700 > From: Tony Luck <[email protected]> > To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>, Chen Gong <[email protected]>, > "Naveen N. Rao" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Pay no attention to 'F' bit in MCACOD when > parsing 'UC' errors. > > Gah ... there is another bug in that unaffected thread entry. The check for > MCG_STATUS should be for RIPV=1 *and* EIPV=0 >
I set "MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, MCG_STATUS_RIPV)" becase
I want it to cover Non-Affected Logical Processors (1,0)
and Affected Logical Processor/Recoverable continuable (1,1).
I think both of them are continuable so they should be as
*KEEP*.
> gmail will mess this patch up ... but should still be readable.
>
> -Tony
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity
> index 7f6ab4e..48f0fd2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static struct severity {
> MCESEV(
> KEEP, "Action required but unaffected thread is continuable",
> SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR,
> MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR),
> - MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, MCG_STATUS_RIPV)
> + MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV, MCG_STATUS_RIPV)
> ),
> MCESEV(
> AR, "Action required: data load error in a user process",
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
