On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:40:16PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> writes: > > > We could just unconditionally increase the alignement in > > intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj - we already have more strict requirements due > > to a bunch of w/a in other places. So shouldn't hurt at all really. > > That seems like a fine plan; 32kB isn't that onerous. Do you want the > trivial patch to do this from me then?
Yes please, merging patches from other people is much easier than begging for review for my own ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
