Am Mittwoch, den 24.07.2013, 18:07 +0100 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:34:42PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> > + ret = regmap_read(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CHIP_ID, &model);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot read chip model id.\n");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CHIP_VARIANT, &revision);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot read chip revision id.\n");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
>
> Is it possible to valiate these at all?
Yes, I think so. Chip id is 0x61, and revision is 3 for da9063.
> > +static int __init da9063_i2c_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_add_driver(&da9063_i2c_driver);
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + pr_err("Failed to register da9063 I2C driver\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +subsys_initcall(da9063_i2c_init);
>
> You should really be able to use module_i2c_driver() for modern systems,
> probe deferral should resolve the init order issues.
Ok, will fix that.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
