On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I didn't add any fields, this is simply catching up with what was > already there. But yes, this is very much intended to be compatible.
So those id fields have been there since 2.6.31 and just no one noticed the header file comments were wrong? That's fine then, I just have a lot of code and other documentation that needs to be updated then. > I suppose you're 'complaining' about these changes? Yeah, maybe I should > have split them up in a separate patch. > > ... > > It should be a NOP functionality wise. yes, it looks like a NOP. I was just surprised to see code changes (even trivial ones) when the commit message only said documentation update. Vince -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
