On 25-07-2013 12:38, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: >>> Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to >>> have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we >>> would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is >>> monitored and what is used for monitoring. >> >> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my >> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it), > > What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a > device node :-) >
ahh ok.. I see. > Pawel > > > > -- You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport) Eduardo Valentin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
