On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com> wrote:
> Policies available in a cpufreq framework are now linked together. They are
> accessible via cpufreq_policy_list defined at cpufreq core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo....@samsung.com>

Looks good but would have been better if you could have moved
existing code to use this infrastructure..

For example, this code in __cpufreq_add_dev()

#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
        /* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
        read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
        for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {

         ---

        }
        read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to