On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The bug is obvious; the fix at the very least *should* be obvious; the
> main source of risk would appear that it might trigger bugs in very old
> versions of gcc.
I used to be worried about "+m", but we're using it a lot these days,
and don't support the (really old) versions of gcc that used to have
trouble with in-out constraints. So the fix looks obvious and safe, no
worries from me.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
