From: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:16:16 -0700
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:14:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:55 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> >> > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:58:28 +0100 >> > >> > > I'm not so sure this is suitable for stable. It doesn't seem to be >> > > helpful to either userland or kernel code. >> > > >> > > In the kernel, we were checking that ver == 1 and type == 1 thus this >> > > wasn't hurting us. >> > > >> > > If userland does anything more with these fields then it's probably >> > > already working around the swapped fields. It can work with both old >> > > and new headers by doing: >> > >> > It's up to you, I would rather have the corrected version propagated >> > as soon as possible. But that's just me. >> >> Let's see what Greg thinks. > > I'm guessing that Linus's tree is also "wrong" here, correct? If so, > the fix that goes into that tree should also go here as well. > > Or am I confused? Linus's tree has had this change for a full release. It went into 3.10 It's correcting a mistake that has been there since the header file even existed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
