We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage
refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to
capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure
cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine.
Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 170d344..35e1a03 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -813,19 +813,18 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev_symlink(unsigned int cpu,
int ret = 0;
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
- struct cpufreq_policy *managed_policy;
struct device *cpu_dev;
if (j == cpu)
continue;
- pr_debug("CPU %u already managed, adding link\n", j);
- managed_policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ pr_debug("Adding link for CPU: %u\n", j);
+ cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(j);
ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq");
if (ret) {
- cpufreq_cpu_put(managed_policy);
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return ret;
}
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
