On 02/08/2013 11:04, boris brezillon wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On 01/08/2013 09:37, Richard Genoud wrote: >> 2013/8/1 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezil...@overkiz.com>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This patch series move at91 SoCs peripheral id definitions from machine >>> specific include dir to dt-bindings include dir. >>> These macros are used to reference interrupts instead of peripheral >>> numbers. >>> >>> This makes dt definitions cleaner and easier to debug (one can easily >>> tell if >>> the peripheral macro used to reference an interrupt line is not the >>> good one). >>> >>> These macros will be used for clk definitions and references too. >>> >>> I am not sure 'include/dt-bindings/at91/xxx' is the best place to put >>> these >>> definitions as there are no soc specific directories in dt-bindings >>> include >>> dir right now. Maybe something like >>> 'include/dt-bindings/soc/at91/xxx' or >>> 'include/dt-bindings/peripherals/at91/xxx' would be better. >>> What do you think ? >> Well, I'd rather use "atmel" than "at91" because, AFAIK, this prefix >> has been dropped for new atmel SoCs (sama5 for instance). > > Should I do the same for at91 clk series (replace drivers/clk/at91 > directory > by drivers/clk/atmel and include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h by > include/linux/clk/atmel_pmc.h) ? I would say so, but like you said, that needs atmel maintainer's feedback !
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
