When renaming ll_poll to busy poll, I introduced a typo
in the name of the do-nothing placeholder for sk_busy_loop
and called it sk_busy_poll.
This broke compile when busy poll was not configured.
Cong Wang submitted a patch to fixed that.
This patch removes the now redundant, misspelled placeholder.

Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.ta...@linux.intel.com>
---

 include/net/busy_poll.h |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index f18b919..8e2dfc1 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -162,11 +162,6 @@ static inline bool sk_can_busy_loop(struct sock *sk)
        return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool sk_busy_poll(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
-{
-       return false;
-}
-
 static inline void skb_mark_napi_id(struct sk_buff *skb,
                                    struct napi_struct *napi)
 {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to