On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 05:17:17 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> > > I've noticed that we allocated unneeded page for cache on read beyond > i_size. Simple test case (I checked it on ramfs): > > $ touch testfile > $ cat testfile > > It triggers 'no_cached_page' code path in do_generic_file_read(). > > Looks like it's regression since commit a32ea1e. Let's fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de> > --- > mm/filemap.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c > index 066bbff..c31d296 100644 > --- a/mm/filemap.c > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > @@ -1163,6 +1163,10 @@ static void do_generic_file_read(struct file *filp, > loff_t *ppos, > loff_t isize; > unsigned long nr, ret; > > + isize = i_size_read(inode); > + if (!isize || index > (isize - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) > + goto out; > + > cond_resched(); > find_page: > page = find_get_page(mapping, index); Looks good to me. Acked-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.de> Thanks, NeilBrown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
