On 08/05, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hmm. It should not crash under strace... please see below. > > > >> 953 ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 1035, 0, 0) = -1 EPERM (Operation not > >> permitted) > > > > OK, so it actually uses ptrace ;) > > > > PTRACE_ATTACH fails because this child is already traced by strace, I guess. > > > > So does Starcraft crash this way? Or does it fail in some other way? > > It's crashing just the same.
But then it is not clear how fab840f can make any difference. wine can not use ptrace when it runs after "strace -f". But, to remind, I know nothing about wine. Perhaps wine uses some daemons which actually run/ptrace the workload? > > And just in case... perhaps wine does some logging too? > > Yeah, but there doesn't seem to be anything interesting: > > http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45489 at least there is certainly nothing interesting for me since I don't understand this ;) Thanks. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/