On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 03:15:36 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The following 5 patches clean up a little mess in acpi_bind_one() and > > acpi_unbind_one(). They are on top of current linux-next plus the patch > > at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2839101/ . > > > > [1/5] Move duplicated code from acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() to a > > separate > > function. > > I think the name of acpi_bind_physnode_name() is a bit confusing as if > it would make some persistent binding. So, I'd suggest to rename it to > acpi_set_physnode_name().
In fact, the plan was to make it mean "physical node name for acpi_bind", but the execution was somewhat sloppy. ;-) I think I'll call it acpi_physnode_link_name(), that should be clear enough. > > [2/5] Create symlinks in acpi_bind_one() under physical_node_lock. > > [3/5] Clean up inconsistent use of whitespace in > > acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one(). > > [4/5] Use list_for_each_entry() to walk the list in acpi_unbind_one(). > > [5/5] Clean up the error code path in acpi_unbind_one(). > > All changes look good. For the series: > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com> Thanks! Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
