Even if I am right the problem is really minor, the patch should be ignored without the authoritative acks.
I am only sending it because I am curious, and I would like to ask another question about audit. search_binary_handler()->audit_bprm(bprm) looks a bit strange, and I can't understand if this is on purpose or not. It adds the the AUDIT_EXECVE record every time the (recursive) search_binary_handler() is called for audit_log_exit() which flushes them all. But probably we only need a single record ? And it seems that audit_aux_data_execve->envc is not used at all. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
