From: Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au>

Add a negative test to test__checkevent_pmu_events() to get lots of
coverage of the negative case, ie. when the modifier is not specified.

Add a test of a single event, and of the group case.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1375795686-4226-2-git-send-email-mich...@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
index b46379c..48114d1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ static int test__checkevent_pmu_events(struct perf_evlist 
*evlist)
                        evsel->attr.exclude_kernel);
        TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->attr.exclude_hv);
        TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", !evsel->attr.precise_ip);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->attr.pinned);
 
        return 0;
 }
@@ -1070,6 +1071,50 @@ static int test__leader_sample2(struct perf_evlist 
*evlist __maybe_unused)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static int test__checkevent_pinned_modifier(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
+{
+       struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
+
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_user", !evsel->attr.exclude_user);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_kernel", evsel->attr.exclude_kernel);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->attr.exclude_hv);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", evsel->attr.precise_ip);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", evsel->attr.pinned);
+
+       return test__checkevent_symbolic_name(evlist);
+}
+
+static int test__pinned_group(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
+{
+       struct perf_evsel *evsel, *leader;
+
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of entries", 3 == evlist->nr_entries);
+
+       /* cycles - group leader */
+       evsel = leader = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == evsel->attr.type);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
+                       PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES == evsel->attr.config);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong group name", !evsel->group_name);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong leader", evsel->leader == leader);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", evsel->attr.pinned);
+
+       /* cache-misses - can not be pinned, but will go on with the leader */
+       evsel = perf_evsel__next(evsel);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == evsel->attr.type);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
+                       PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES == evsel->attr.config);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->attr.pinned);
+
+       /* branch-misses - ditto */
+       evsel = perf_evsel__next(evsel);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config",
+                       PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES == evsel->attr.config);
+       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong pinned", !evsel->attr.pinned);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static int count_tracepoints(void)
 {
        char events_path[PATH_MAX];
@@ -1294,6 +1339,14 @@ static struct evlist_test test__events[] = {
                .name  = "{instructions,branch-misses}:Su",
                .check = test__leader_sample2,
        },
+       [40] = {
+               .name  = "instructions:uDp",
+               .check = test__checkevent_pinned_modifier,
+       },
+       [41] = {
+               .name  = "{cycles,cache-misses,branch-misses}:D",
+               .check = test__pinned_group,
+       },
 };
 
 static struct evlist_test test__events_pmu[] = {
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to