Not used in the function, so no sense in doing the lookup here. Thread look
up will be done in the timehist command, and no sense in doing it twice.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-sched.c |    7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
index 34ce57d..5285024 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
@@ -1425,15 +1425,8 @@ static int perf_sched__process_tracepoint_sample(struct 
perf_tool *tool __maybe_
                                                 struct perf_evsel *evsel,
                                                 struct machine *machine)
 {
-       struct thread *thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, sample->tid);
        int err = 0;
 
-       if (thread == NULL) {
-               pr_debug("problem processing %s event, skipping it.\n",
-                        perf_evsel__name(evsel));
-               return -1;
-       }
-
        evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
        hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
 
-- 
1.7.10.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to