On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 07:18:19PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
> 
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 10 +---------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> index 45e4d7f..336f171 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> @@ -125,19 +125,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct 
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  /* Module init and exit code */
>  static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> -     int result;
> -
>       /* cpuinfo and default policy values */
>       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 5000; /* 5uS */
>       policy->cur = kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
>  
> -     result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, kirkwood_freq_table);
> -     if (result)
> -             return result;
> -
> -     cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(kirkwood_freq_table, policy->cpu);
> -
> -     return 0;
> +     return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, kirkwood_freq_table);
>  }
>  
>  static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> -- 
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>

Thanks
        Andrew 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to