Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Kelvin (decikelvin?) is probably a good unit to use in the kernel. If you > want something else you convert it in the programs you use to interact > with the kernel. This is a usespace issue, I think. > Decikelvins is a good bet if we feel that fitting into 16 bits is a necessary, or the width of things is limited. Otherwise I would go for millikelvins on the general principle that creating interfaces too narrow is really painful. -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- temperature standard - global config option? David N. Welton
- Re: temperature standard - global config opti... Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: temperature standard - global config opti... J . A . Magallon
- Re: temperature standard - global config opti... Paul Fulghum
- Re: temperature standard - global config opti... Chris Boot
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... Peter Svensson
- Re: temperature standard - global con... Bill Pringlemeir
- Re: temperature standard - global con... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: temperature standard - global... Kipp Cannon
- Re: temperature standard - g... Maciej Zenczykowski
- Re: temperature standard... David Flynn
- Re: temperature standard - g... Pavel Machek
- Re: temperature standard - global con... Pavel Machek
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... José Luis Domingo López
- Re: temperature standard - global con... watermodem
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... Matthias Urlichs
- es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5-ac9 Alan Olsen
- Re: es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5... Keith Owens