On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 15:53 -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Toshi Kani <[email protected]> wrote: > > add_memory() and remove_memory() can only handle a memory range aligned > > with section. There are problems when an unaligned range is added and > > then deleted as follows: > > > > - add_memory() with an unaligned range succeeds, but __add_pages() > > called from add_memory() adds a whole section of pages even though > > a given memory range is less than the section size. > > - remove_memory() to the added unaligned range hits BUG_ON() in > > __remove_pages(). > > > > This patch changes add_memory() and remove_memory() to check if a given > > memory range is aligned with section at the beginning. As the result, > > add_memory() fails with -EINVAL when a given range is unaligned, and > > does not add such memory range. This prevents remove_memory() to be > > called with an unaligned range as well. Note that remove_memory() has > > to use BUG_ON() since this function cannot fail. > > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]> > > --- > > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > memory_hotplug.c is maintained by me and kamezawa-san. Please cc us > if you have a subsequent patch.
Oh, I see. Sorry about that. Yes, I will copy you two from the next time. > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> Thanks! -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
