3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Shaohua Li <[email protected]> commit 2865a8fb44cc32420407362cbda80c10fa09c6b2 upstream. $echo '0' > /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/xxx/numa $cat /sys/bus/workqueue/devices/xxx/numa I got 1. It should be 0, the reason is copy_workqueue_attrs() called in apply_workqueue_attrs() doesn't copy no_numa field. Fix it by making copy_workqueue_attrs() copy ->no_numa too. This would also make get_unbound_pool() set a pool's ->no_numa attribute according to the workqueue attributes used when the pool was created. While harmelss, as ->no_numa isn't a pool attribute, this is a bit confusing. Clear it explicitly. tj: Updated description and comments a bit. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3398,6 +3398,12 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct { to->nice = from->nice; cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask); + /* + * Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore + * ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead, + * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying. + */ + to->no_numa = from->no_numa; } /* hash value of the content of @attr */ @@ -3565,6 +3571,12 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_p lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1); /* see put_pwq() */ copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs); + /* + * no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See + * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail. + */ + pool->attrs->no_numa = false; + /* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */ if (wq_numa_enabled) { for_each_node(node) { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
