On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:21:04 -0700 Kees Cook <k...@outflux.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:19:03PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> >     list_for_each_safe(cur, tmp, &sbi->s_es_lru) {
> > +           int ret;
> > + 
> >             /*
> >              * If we have already reclaimed all extents from extent
> >              * status tree, just stop the loop immediately.
> 
> Which is masking the "ret" at the start, leading to warnings at build-time:
> 
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c: In function _____ext4_es_shrink___:
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c:950:6: warning: unused variable ___ret___ 
> [-Wunused-variable]

yup.

From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: fs-convert-fs-shrinkers-to-new-scan-count-api-fix-fix-2

fix shadowed local, spell "skipped" correctly

Cc: Dave Chinner <dchin...@redhat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glom...@openvz.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <k...@outflux.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/ext4/extents_status.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
fs/ext4/extents_status.c~fs-convert-fs-shrinkers-to-new-scan-count-api-fix-fix-2
 fs/ext4/extents_status.c
--- 
a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c~fs-convert-fs-shrinkers-to-new-scan-count-api-fix-fix-2
+++ a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -946,15 +946,15 @@ static int __ext4_es_shrink(struct ext4_
 {
        struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
        struct list_head *cur, *tmp;
-       LIST_HEAD(skiped);
-       int ret, nr_shrunk = 0;
+       LIST_HEAD(skipped);
+       int nr_shrunk = 0;
        int retried = 0, skip_precached = 1, nr_skipped = 0;
 
        spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lru_lock);
 
 retry:
        list_for_each_safe(cur, tmp, &sbi->s_es_lru) {
-               int ret;
+               int shrunk;
 
                /*
                 * If we have already reclaimed all extents from extent
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ retry:
                    (skip_precached && ext4_test_inode_state(&ei->vfs_inode,
                                                EXT4_STATE_EXT_PRECACHED))) {
                        nr_skipped++;
-                       list_move_tail(cur, &skiped);
+                       list_move_tail(cur, &skipped);
                        continue;
                }
 
@@ -982,19 +982,19 @@ retry:
                        continue;
 
                write_lock(&ei->i_es_lock);
-               ret = __es_try_to_reclaim_extents(ei, nr_to_scan);
+               shrunk = __es_try_to_reclaim_extents(ei, nr_to_scan);
                if (ei->i_es_lru_nr == 0)
                        list_del_init(&ei->i_es_lru);
                write_unlock(&ei->i_es_lock);
 
-               nr_shrunk += ret;
-               nr_to_scan -= ret;
+               nr_shrunk += shrunk;
+               nr_to_scan -= shrunk;
                if (nr_to_scan == 0)
                        break;
        }
 
        /* Move the newer inodes into the tail of the LRU list. */
-       list_splice_tail(&skiped, &sbi->s_es_lru);
+       list_splice_tail(&skipped, &sbi->s_es_lru);
 
        /*
         * If we skipped any inodes, and we weren't able to make any
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to