On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:20:03PM +0300, L. K. wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Philips wrote: > > > Kelvins good idea in general - it is always positive ;-) > > > > 0.01*K fits in 16 bits and gives reasonable range. > > > > but may be something like K<<6 could be a option? (to allow use of shifts > > instead of muls/divs). It would be much more easier to extract int part. > > > > just my 2 eurocents. > > Why not make it in Celsius ? Is more easy to read it this way. It's easier for you as a user to read, but slightly harder to deal with inside the code. It's really a user-space issue, inside the kernel should be as standardized as possible, and Kelvins make the most sense there. -Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: temperature standard - global con... Pavel Machek
- Re: temperature standard - global config optio... José Luis Domingo López
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... watermodem
- Re: temperature standard - global config optio... Matthias Urlichs
- es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5-ac9 Alan Olsen
- Re: es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5-ac9 Keith Owens
- Re: temperature standard - global config optio... Pavel Machek
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: temperature standard - global con... Philips
- Re: temperature standard - global... L. K.
- Re: temperature standard - gl... David Rees
- Re: temperature standard... Chris Boot
- Re: temperature standard... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard - gl... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: temperature standard... L. K.
- Re: temperature standard... mirabilos {Thorsten Glaser}
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard... Thomas Speck
- Re: temperature standard... Chris Boot
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield