On 10 August 2013 12:14, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() 
> routines
> and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be 
> used
> by cpufreq drivers then.
>
> This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
>
> Cc: Guan Xuetao <g...@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c | 16 +---------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who
had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes
it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table.
And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table...

And so this patch is dropped :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to