* Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > So we're now down to something like:
> >
> > decl fs:preempt_count
> > cmpl PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED,fs:preempt_count
> > jnz 1f
>
> Well, this isn't worth doing unless you can make PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED be
> the high bit, and we can combine it into just "decl+jns". Otherwise we'd
> be better off with the simpler two separate adjacent variables.
Definitely, the cmpl should be avoided.
PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED could be made the high bit - or maybe an even simpler
solution is to invert its meaning: making '0' the "it needs to resched!"
case, so the check would be decl+jz?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
