On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:15:28 +0100 Luis Henriques <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> writes: > > > 3.6.11.7-rc1 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > Not exactly an objection, but the commit text refers to: > > a0497f9 mac80211/minstrel_ht: add support for using CCK rates > > which doesn't seem to exist in 3.6 kernel. I wonder if this commit is > actually needed. No it doesn't :-/ Grumble, it would be nice if people added which kernel a patch goes to. I started out looking at over 200 commits to determine which should be backported or not. I look for any stable tags first, and then read the commit log for SHA1s that I can look for. It seems that I missed that this commit did state which commit caused the issue, it must have applied fine, because failed applied patches I scrutinize even more. Oh well, I'll nuke this commit. Thanks! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
