Hey, Kent. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Should probably be almost as good, yeah... in theory, but the space > efficiency still isn't going to be as good, and it'll probably be more > code... and at this point I really just don't want to futz with it more. > At this point unless there's something really wrong with this code I > just want to move onto something else :P
I think it probably would be okay in most cases but don't feel confident about acking as it's making trade-offs which are unnecessary and unusual. So, ummm, I really don't know. Maybe it's better enough than what we have now but at the same time if you want to reimplement the whole thing you should be persistent / reliable enough to see it through this time around too, right? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
