On 08/15/2013 05:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:16:17PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> ...
>> @@ -719,6 +723,10 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range_rev(u64
>> *idx, int nid,
>> if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES&& nid != memblock_get_region_node(m))
>> continue;
>>
>> + /* skip hotpluggable memory regions */
>> + if (m->flags& MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */
>> for ( ; ri>= 0; ri--) {
>> struct memblock_region *r =&rsv->regions[ri];
>> --
>
> Why don't you add this also in __next_free_mem_range()?
Hi Naoya,
__next_free_mem_range_rev() is for for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(),
which is
only called in memblock_find_in_range_node().
But I think __next_free_mem_range() is for for_each_free_mem_range,
which is
called by many others. These callers could has nothing to do with memory
hotplug.
So I didn't add.
Maybe adding the check here is not good. I'm trying to find somewhere to
check MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG.
Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
