Hi Jonathan, Am 15.08.2013 19:29, schrieb Jonathan Austin: > Hi André > > (I've put RMK and LAKML back on Cc: they got dropped somewhere along the way) > > On 14/08/13 22:21, André Hentschel wrote: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>> Now we've only got one instruction between the store and the load >>>>>>>> and risk stalling the pipeline... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dave M cautiously says "The ancient advice was that one instruction >>>>>>>> was enough" but this is very core dependent... I wonder if anyone >>>>>>>> has a good idea about whether this is an issue here...? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We could use a ldrd at the top, that'd be nearly what we have right >>>>>>> now, don't we? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yea, that'd be good - as far as I can see from an 1136 TRM, the ldrd >>>>>> *may* be two cycles (depending on alignment of the words) but the ldr >>>>>> and ldrne will always be two cycles. Ahhh, the joys of modifying the >>>>>> fast path ;) >>> >>> Was expecting to see something that reflected this discussion, >> >> Ah ok, i misunderstood that, sry. >> Something like that? >> >> From: André Hentschel <n...@dawncrow.de> >> >> This patch intents to reduce loading instructions when the resulting value >> is not used. >> It's a follow up on a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760 >> > > You caught me just before running away for a week of holiday, but I've > managed to squeeze in a bit of testing - hope this helps - I'll try to be > clear about what I have/haven't tested so you can judge for yourself how much > weight to give this.
Thanks for testing it anyway, and happy holiday! > What I've tested: > > * Apply your code to 3.11-rc5 > * Boot on Integrator CP (1176 r1p0) and run a full Debian Wheezy init > > --> It works! > > I also applied the following diff and rebuilt to check that we were really > testing the V6 NOT V6K path here: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h > index 31743f7..71dfe82 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > #define switch_tls switch_tls_v6 > #elif defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K) > #define tls_emu 0 > +#error > #define has_tls_reg 1 > #define switch_tls switch_tls_v6k > #else > > What I've *not* tested: > * As this CPU does not have the tls register, I haven't run any tests that > try to read/write it, but we wouldn't expect that to work, right? > * Haven't tried a V7 platform, as I understand you've already done that. > * Haven't verified it still builds for v4 (which was the problem for ldrd in > the past and now we've put it back, so that's important) It shouldn't matter as v4 would not use the v6 codepath, would it? > * Performance impact I only could test it on v7, would be interesting to see some v6, v5, ... "benchmarks", though. > > I think it'd be good if you can verify the bottom two points - especially the > ldrd one: perhaps Russell can tell you which platform it broke on before? > > So, that's a > Tested-by: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.aus...@arm.com> > > If you want it :) sure, thx. > Hope that helps, > > Jonny > >> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <n...@dawncrow.de> >> >> --- >> This patch is against 28fbc8b6a29c849a3f03a6b05010d4b584055665 >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h >> index 83259b8..31743f7 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/tls.h >> @@ -3,29 +3,31 @@ >> >> #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ >> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h> >> - .macro switch_tls_none, base, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + .macro switch_tls_none, prev, next, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> .endm >> >> - .macro switch_tls_v6k, base, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + .macro switch_tls_v6k, prev, next, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + ldrd \tp, \tpuser, [\next, #TI_TP_VALUE] @ get the next TLS and >> user r/w register >> mrc p15, 0, \tmp2, c13, c0, 2 @ get the user r/w register >> mcr p15, 0, \tp, c13, c0, 3 @ set TLS register >> mcr p15, 0, \tpuser, c13, c0, 2 @ and the user r/w register >> - str \tmp2, [\base, #TI_TP_VALUE + 4] @ save it >> + str \tmp2, [\prev, #TI_TP_VALUE + 4] @ save it >> .endm >> >> - .macro switch_tls_v6, base, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + .macro switch_tls_v6, prev, next, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + ldrd \tp, \tpuser, [\next, #TI_TP_VALUE] >> ldr \tmp1, =elf_hwcap >> ldr \tmp1, [\tmp1, #0] >> mov \tmp2, #0xffff0fff >> tst \tmp1, #HWCAP_TLS @ hardware TLS available? >> streq \tp, [\tmp2, #-15] @ set TLS value at 0xffff0ff0 >> - mrcne p15, 0, \tmp2, c13, c0, 2 @ get the user r/w register >> + mrcne p15, 0, \tmp2, c13, c0, 2 @ get the previous user r/w >> register >> mcrne p15, 0, \tp, c13, c0, 3 @ yes, set TLS register >> mcrne p15, 0, \tpuser, c13, c0, 2 @ set user r/w register >> - strne \tmp2, [\base, #TI_TP_VALUE + 4] @ save it >> + strne \tmp2, [\prev, #TI_TP_VALUE + 4] @ save it >> .endm >> >> - .macro switch_tls_software, base, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> + .macro switch_tls_software, prev, next, tp, tpuser, tmp1, tmp2 >> mov \tmp1, #0xffff0fff >> str \tp, [\tmp1, #-15] @ set TLS value at 0xffff0ff0 >> .endm >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S >> index d40d0ef..11112de 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S >> @@ -689,12 +689,10 @@ ENTRY(__switch_to) >> THUMB( stmia ip!, {r4 - sl, fp} ) @ Store most regs on >> stack >> THUMB( str sp, [ip], #4 ) >> THUMB( str lr, [ip], #4 ) >> - ldr r4, [r2, #TI_TP_VALUE] >> - ldr r5, [r2, #TI_TP_VALUE + 4] >> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS >> ldr r6, [r2, #TI_CPU_DOMAIN] >> #endif >> - switch_tls r1, r4, r5, r3, r7 >> + switch_tls r1, r2, r4, r5, r3, r7 >> #if defined(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP) >> ldr r7, [r2, #TI_TASK] >> ldr r8, =__stack_chk_guard >> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/