From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
ep_free() might iterate on a huge set of epitems and hold
cpu too long. Add two cond_resched() in order to yield cpu
to other tasks. This is safe as we only hold mutexes in
this function.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Cc: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
---
Google-Bug-Id: 8940884
fs/eventpoll.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 9ad17b15..4ff595d 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -740,6 +740,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
+ cond_resched();
}
/*
@@ -754,6 +755,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
while ((rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
+ cond_resched();
}
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
