Hi, On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c >> index 4bf0fc0..2ba7f4e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c >> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int set_room(struct tty_struct *tty) >> * characters will be beeped. >> */ >> if (left <= 0) >> - left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; >> + if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait)) >> + left = ldata->icanon && !ldata->canon_data; >> old_left = tty->receive_room; >> tty->receive_room = left; > Was this applied? You may want to cc rjw... it is a regression, it is > not pretty, and it is something I blieve I hit but thought it was some > kind of "X weirdness". There were no replies to the previous mail asking for comments, and as far as I can see this has not been applied. I don't know who rjw is, could you be a bit more explicit, please? -- Besos, Marga -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
