On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:38 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> Need check the return value of proc_put_char(), just like another have
> done in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sysctl.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 7822cd8..ee00986 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -2214,8 +2214,11 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, 
> struct ctl_table *table, int
>                       *i = val;
>               } else {
>                       val = convdiv * (*i) / convmul;
> -                     if (!first)
> +                     if (!first) {
>                               err = proc_put_char(&buffer, &left, '\t');
> +                             if (err)
> +                                     goto free;
> +                     }

I think you should use break and convert it in
to goto free in patch 2/2.

Otherwise, this style looks out of place.

>                       err = proc_put_long(&buffer, &left, val, false);
>                       if (err)
>                               break;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to