On 08/20/13 14:50, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
I've only received a few patches of this series. I *think* using "RFC" alone is not correct in LAKML and for some reason you're required to use RFC/PATCH.
Ezequiel, we already sorted out, why they got stuck on LAKML. It is because of the missing PATCH prefix, I'll add that in future postings for sure. But the patches should have been managed to get through to LKML.
Maybe that's why I'm getting only the patches where I'm Cced?
I try to keep Cc list as short as possible, so I only put Gregory as the maintainer of mach-mvebu on Cc.
Could you please re-send this? The series looks promising and I'd like to take a peep :-)
No, I am not going to resend v1 but only updates. For a single mach you need patches [1], [2], and the one supposed for your mach.
BTW, some of this (but not all) has already been posted [1, 2] and is on its way to v3.12 through Daniel Lezcano. (Maybe you already noticed, but just in case...) [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg265509.html [2] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/260179
I expect machs to move until all of it has been Ack'ed, so I based in on most recent tag of linux-next yesterday. Sebastian [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/19/591 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/19/592 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
