On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > The important question is does he want to handle patches that you're > flipping out about not going in before the next merge window because > they are SO IMPORTANT that the trivial tree must promote them out of > sequence.
You're misreading. I see no flipping out here. I'm simply saying that obvious defects should be corrected sooner rather than later. I'm also saying that the trivial tree should have some visibility about whether or not a patch or series will be handled by the trivial maintainer or not. Jiri has not responded to this point. Silence about the status of patches that extends for months is not good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
