OK now I'm confused. I guess I shouldn't comment while on vacation and cache cold on everything.
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcu...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:11:25PM +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >> Eep. This should be reverted, indeed. This isn't a manifest bug on >!Xen but we >> have gotten requests for WT support which would mean adding in the >PAT but again. > >Please no, letme fix it. That's what I'm having in mind: don't use pse >bit in swap >entry but always mark page read from swap as dirty one (it's better >than having >no tracker at all and will be the case on old machines with 32bit ptes >only). -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
