Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.dan...@samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c     |  7 +------
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 0f87a29..c9ae7e6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -214,12 +214,7 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = {
 
 static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-       /* set the transition latency value */
-       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000;
-
-       cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
-
-       return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, exynos_info->freq_table);
+       return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, exynos_info->freq_table, 100000);
 }
 
 static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c 
b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index b9673fa..68da5f4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -308,18 +308,8 @@ static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void)
 
 static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-       int ret;
-
-       ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, dvfs_info->freq_table);
-       if (ret) {
-               dev_err(dvfs_info->dev, "Invalid frequency table: %d\n", ret);
-               return ret;
-       }
-
-       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = dvfs_info->latency;
-       cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
-
-       return 0;
+       return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, dvfs_info->freq_table,
+                       dvfs_info->latency);
 }
 
 static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to