On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:07:36PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> writes:
> 
> > Util now, we get a resv_map by two ways according to each mapping type.
> > This makes code dirty and unreadable. So unfiying it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 869c3e0..e6c0c77 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -421,13 +421,24 @@ void resv_map_release(struct kref *ref)
> >     kfree(resv_map);
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline struct resv_map *inode_resv_map(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +   return inode->i_mapping->private_data;
> > +}
> 
> it would be nice to get have another function that will return resv_map
> only if we have HPAGE_RESV_OWNER. So that we could use that in
> hugetlb_vm_op_open/close. ? Otherwise 

It is answered in previous reply.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to