On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote,
> Some minor nitpicking, nothing much :)
Is there any chance to pull those corrected patches to v3.12?
>
> On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
> > +{
> > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list,
> > policy_list) {
> > + freq_table =
> > cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
> > + if (freq_table) {
> > + ret =
> > cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy,
> > + freq_table);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + policy->user_policy.max =
> > policy->max;
> > + __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> > CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
> > + }
>
> In case ret wasn't 0 (i.e. we failed), we should print an error
> message and break
> our loop ?
After your comments I think, that this code could be rewritten:
list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
if (freq_table) {
ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy,
freq_table);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Policy frequency update
failed\n")
break;
}
policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
__cpufreq_governor(policy,CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
}
}
return ret;
}
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled == state)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> > + cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = state;
> > + write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(state);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> > + cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> > + write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock,
> > flags); +
> > + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", __func__,
> > + state ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> s/enabled/enable and s/disabled/disable
Ok.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
