On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:50:22AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:06:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:38:40AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:53:53AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > > Commit 9a11899c5e69 (USB: OHCI: add missing PCI PM callbacks to > > > > > > ohci-pci.c) added missing ohci_suspend and ohci_resume callback > > > > > > pointers, but forgot that these callbacks are declared and defined > > > > > > only when CONFIG_PM is enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch adds a preprocessor conditional to avoid build errors > > > > > > when > > > > > > PM is disabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Guenter and Meelis, does the patch below fix the problem for you? > > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> > > > > > > > > Previously failing builds: > > > > mips:ath79_defconfig > > > > powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig > > > > powerpc:cell_defconfig > > > > powerpc:maple_defconfig > > > > parisc:defconfig > > > > tile:defconfig > > > > sparc32:defconfig > > > > sparc64:defconfig > > > > > > > > as well as the powerpc qemu test (with the config file used > > > > by the yocto project) > > > > > > > > All builds pass with the patch applied, as does the qemu test. > > > > > > Thanks for testing, I'll queue it up later today (at an airport right > > > now, about to board a flight), and send it to Linus later tonight if no > > > one else has any problems with it. > > > > > To simplify this kind of testing, I added a 'testing' branch to the list of > > branches I am auto-building. Right now it runs a complete test cycle with > > the > > patch applied on top of v3.11-rc7. This should ensure that the patch doesn't > > break any previously passing builds. You should see the results in the > > 'testing' > > column of the stable queue build table on > > http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders > > when you get out of the plane. > > Thanks, all looks good, except for xtensa, which says I broke something, > but I can't understand what, as I don't see any networking patches in my > tree at the moment. > That has been broken in Linus' tree for a while - at least since I started running my test builds. I don't understand xtensa good enough to know how to fix it. I have seen similar problems before, though, so I suspect it has something to do with the architecture and not with the affected file itself.
I submitted a patch to fix the broken arm:allmodconfig build. Hopefully it should find its way into Linus' tree in the near future. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/