On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:15:42AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> This patch changes the cpufreq-cpu0 driver to consider if
> a cpu needs cooling (with cpufreq). In case the cooling is needed,
> it can be flagged at the cpu0 device tree node, with the list
> of zones property 'cooling-zones'.
>
> In case this list of zones is present, the driver will
> load a cpufreq cooling device in the system. The cpufreq-cpu0
> driver is not interested in determining how the system should
> be using the cooling device. The driver is responsible
> only of loading the cooling device.
>
> Describing how the cooling device will be used can be
> accomplished by setting up a thermal zone that references
> and is composed by the cpufreq cooling device.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herr...@calxeda.com>
> Cc: cpuf...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valen...@ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 4 ++++
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> index 051f764..add50f7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ Optional properties:
> - clock-latency: Specify the possible maximum transition latency for clock,
> in unit of nanoseconds.
> - voltage-tolerance: Specify the CPU voltage tolerance in percentage.
> +- cooling-zones: A list of thermal zones phandles. The generic cpu
> + cooling (freq clipping) is loaded by the generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
> + in case the device tree node has this list.
Bindings should not describe the behaviour of any kernel (and for that
reason I'm not very keen on the current cpufreq-cpu0 binding document).
Bindings should simply describe the hardware. This addition could
instead be:
- cooling-zones: a list of thermal zone phandles.
However, as the thermal zone binding doesn't seem to have appeared by
this patch, it should get moved later anyway...
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> Examples:
>
> @@ -33,6 +36,7 @@ cpus {
> 198000 850000
> >;
> clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> + cooling-zones = <&cpu_thermal>;
> };
>
> cpu@1 {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> index ad1fde2..ede6487 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>
> static unsigned int transition_latency;
> static unsigned int voltage_tolerance; /* in percentage */
> @@ -28,6 +31,7 @@ static struct device *cpu_dev;
> static struct clk *cpu_clk;
> static struct regulator *cpu_reg;
> static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> +static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>
> static int cpu0_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> @@ -268,6 +272,13 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> goto out_free_table;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * For now, just loading the cooling device;
> + * thermal DT code takes care of matching them.
> + */
> + if (of_find_property(np, "cooling-zones", NULL))
> + cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(cpu_present_mask);
> +
> of_node_put(np);
> of_node_put(parent);
> return 0;
> @@ -283,6 +294,7 @@ out_put_parent:
>
> static int cpu0_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(cdev);
> cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpu0_cpufreq_driver);
> opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
>
> --
> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
