On 28 August 2013 00:17, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Sure that works just as well. Here's a patch.
>
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 7b839a8..b9b20fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct 
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  {
>         int i;
>
> +       if (!policy->governor_enabled)
> +               return;
> +
>         if (!all_cpus) {
>                 __gov_queue_work(smp_processor_id(), dbs_data, delay);
>         } else {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to