It does not make sense to show ti prefix in pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map()
dev_err messages.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
index 2c62225..55a0ebe 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
@@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ int pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
*pctldev,
if (ret < 0) {
/* EINVAL=missing, which is fine since it's optional */
if (ret != -EINVAL)
- dev_err(dev,
- "could not parse property ti,function\n");
+ dev_err(dev, "could not parse property function\n");
function = NULL;
}
@@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ int pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
*pctldev,
reserve++;
ret = of_property_count_strings(np, "pins");
if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "could not parse property ti,pins\n");
+ dev_err(dev, "could not parse property pins\n");
goto exit;
}
reserve *= ret;
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
