On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:57:43PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > We could add a ____this_cpu variant that would be used in the cases we do > not want preemption checks? There should not be too many but it will > mean a whole lot of new definitions in percpu.h.
Let's get away from underscores as they are meaningless. A this_cpu_atomic() or other descriptive name would be much more appropriate. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
