On Mon 2013-08-26 10:40:50, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Apologies for my previous top post reply...
> 
> Quoting Pavel Machek (2013-08-25 08:38:11)
> > Is the allocation actually neccessary? At the very least this should
> > test for NULL...
> 
> 
> Thanks Pavel!  I'll add the check for NULL.
> 
> name_to_dev_t expects a non-const name, but the buffer passed in
> is const.  I also am removing the '\n' if found at the end of the
> string which would violate the const.

Fix name_to_dev_t, then. No need to do memory allocation just to work
around const.

[You can also take a look why it is const in the first place. I don't
think it needs to be.]

                                                                        Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to