On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 15:48 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/30/13 15:14, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > But another question still remains: why compiler does not warn that > > size truncation happens? How to prevent bugs like CFQ one in the > > future? Should we add a compile-time assert to do_div() to prevent > > passing 64 numbers in "base" macro parameter? > That sounds like a fine idea to me.
Geert thought so too and submitted a patch http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg26788.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
