On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches > 1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI > stub implemented based on these patches, so the common code has now > been tested with another architecture, and he has acked these patches. > If the current patches are OK, can this be queued for 3.12? (and into > linux-next, if appropriate) > The ARM portion may take a little longer based on the EFI runtime > services patch dependencies, but getting the common code merged would > allow the ARM64 EFI stub work to go forward independently. > > I can resend patches 1-13 as a new series of x86/common only changes > if you would like.
I think resending the common patches as a new series, including Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags, and after addressing Grant's comments is the best idea. We've missed the v3.12 merge window now, but we can certainly get these into linux-next for some testing. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
