On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:34:43PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > Maybe there could be some HW related reason because of which it fixed for yes, most probably he didn't had any zone empty so the fix couldn't make a difference for him. German, can you confirm? (if you don't know what it means just show me a SYSRQ+M and I'll find out myself :) Since the fix didn't helped it sounds like the memory balancing in -ac is not working properly for other reasons too. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac15 German Gomez Garcia
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac15 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac1... German Gomez Garcia
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5... Luigi Genoni
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac1... Rik van Riel
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2... Rik van Riel
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap un... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swa... Rik van Riel
- Re: Strange behaviour of... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac15 Rik van Riel
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac1... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5... Mike Galbraith
- Re: Strange behaviour of swap under 2.4.5-ac15 German Gomez Garcia